Negative valence system
The negative valence system is primarily responsible for reactions to aversive situations and includes the constructs of acute threat, potential threat, sustained threat, as well as loss and frustrative non-reward. The acute threat system is related to the defensive motivational system, which protects the organism from a perceived danger initiating adaptive responses. The frustrative non-reward system is triggered by the withdrawal or prevention of expected rewards, which may lead to an arousal exceeding normal regulatory capacity and thus precipitating aggressive or antisocial responses.
We hypothesize that a perceived or potential danger can trigger a fight response in individuals hypersensitive to threat. Similarly, aggressive behavior may be a response to frustration. Anger in response to frustrative non-reward can promote aggressive behaviors. Investigations of this topic will address whether the aggressive response is determined by increased and altered bottom-up signaling of threat cues and/or frustrative non-reward, and how this is reflected on the neural, neurochemical, and hormonal levels. The focus is on the identification of specific negative valence system dysfunctions relevant to aggression in mental disorders.
Related to this topic #
Projects
A02: Context effects on threat processing in dependence of testosterone levels
A03: Modulation of aggression by acute threat
A04: Implicit chemosensory threat signals as stimulators of amygdala hyperresponsiveness in AMD
A05: Peripersonal space violations and social threat: daily-life psychological and neural mechanisms of environmental risk for reactive aggression
A06: Decoding dynamic reciprocal neural mechanism underlying reactive aggression: Insights from fMRI and fNIRS hyperscanning
A07: The intestinal microbiota as a regulator of aggressive and impulsive behavior
A08: The metabolic lung-brain axis in aggressive behavior in patients with AMD
Publications
Gender differences in aggression associated with mental disorders
Aggressive behavior shows striking gender differences. Cross-cultural research shows that men are more likely to engage in physical aggression, while women tend to use indirect forms of aggressive behavior. Aggression is a multifactorial phenomenon influenced by situational, genetic, psychological and other factors. Despite being a transdiagnostic feature in numerous mental disorders, gender-specific differences and the underlying influencing factors have not yet been sufficiently investigated. Many findings originate from older publications and methodologically sound and in particular behavior-based investigations are rare. This article provides a narrative literature review that summarizes the current state of research on gender differences in aggression in selected mental disorders, including substance use disorders, psychotic disorders and borderline personality disorder. The implications for future research and the clinical practice are discussed.
A cognitive neuroscience approach to understanding aggression and its treatment
While anyone can behave aggressively, some people are more prone to aggression than others. We present a neuro-cognitive model and consider several inter-individual differences that confer risk for aggression. Forms of atypical cognitive function include a hyperreactive acute threat response, poor emotion regulation, and mechanisms involved in choosing when to aggress. We show dysfunction in the neural systems mediating these functions may account for aggression in people high in psychopathy/callous unemotional traits, irritability/anger, hostility, impulsivity, and low in frustration tolerance. We then review promising interventions including psychological therapies and pharmaceuticals that might influence the neuro-cognitive underpinnings of these constructs. Although there is no overwhelming “one size fits all” approach to treating aggression, identifying the neural mechanisms implicated in these traits may improve individualized treatments.
Voice as objective biomarker of stress: association of speech features and cortisol
Objective:: Cortisol is a well-established biomarker of stress, assessed through salivary or blood samples, which are intrusive and time-consuming. Speech, influenced by physiological stress responses, offers a promising non-invasive, real-time alternative for stress detection. This study examined relationships between speech features, state anger, and salivary cortisol using a validated stress-induction paradigm.