Skip to main content
  1. Contributors/

Dr. Tengfei Feng

RWTH Aachen University

Related content

Publications


Complex Network Responses to Regulation of a Brain-Computer Interface During Semi-Naturalistic Behavior

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used to monitor and provide real-time feedback on brain signals, directly influencing external systems, such as virtual environments (VE), to support self-regulation. We piloted a novel immersive, first-person shooting BCI-VE during which the avatars’ movement speed was directly influenced by neural activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA). Previous analyses revealed behavioral and localized neural effects for active versus reduced contingency neurofeedback in a randomized controlled trial design. However, the modeling of neural dynamics during such complex tasks challenges traditional event-related approaches. To overcome this limitation, we employed a data-driven framework utilizing group-level independent networks derived from BOLD-specific components of the multi-echo fMRI data obtained during the BCI regulation. Individual responses were estimated through dual regression. The spatial independent components corresponded to established cognitive networks and task-specific networks related to gaming actions. Compared to reduced contingency neurofeedback, active regulation induced significantly elevated fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) in a frontoparietal control network, and spatial reweighting of a salience/ventral attention network, with stronger expression in SMA, prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, and occipital regions. These findings underscore the distributed network engagement of BCI regulation during a behavioral task in an immersive virtual environment.

Basic stimulus processing alterations from top-down cognitive control in depression drive independent temporal components of multi-echo naturalistic fMRI data

Perceptual changes in major depressive disorder (MDD) may extend beyond emotional content and include the processing of basic stimulus features. These alterations may ultimately contribute to perceptual bias and anhedonia. To characterize blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal of perceptual processing, we investigated temporally independent fMRI signal components related to naturalistic stimulus processing in 39 patients with MDD and 36 healthy subjects. Leveraging the capability of multi-echo data to detect BOLD activity changes, we extracted physiologically meaningful group temporal components. For each component that exhibited a significant correlation with the movie content, we localized its underlying brain network and assessed MDD-associated alterations. Two components exhibited significant group differences; one was associated with auditory features (sound pressure level) and one with visual features (temporal contrast of intensity). Notably, these deficits in MDD localized primarily to higher-order processing areas, such as the dorsal prefrontal cortex and insula, rather than primary sensory cortices. For the visual feature component, additional group differences emerged in non-visual primary sensory cortices (auditory and somatosensory) as well as major hubs of the motor system. Our findings support the hypothesis that basic sensory processing deficits represent an inherent feature of MDD which may contribute to anhedonia and negative perceptual bias. These deficits are primarily confined to higher-order processing units, as well as cross-modal primary sensory cortices indicating predominant dysfunction of top-down control and multisensory integration. Therapeutic effects of interventions targeting the prefrontal cortex may be partially mediated by restoring prefrontal control not only over emotional but also sensory processing hubs.